Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias

Objective: To characterize hospital admissions in the Internal Medicine department of a general hospital. To analyze social, economic and environmental health factors implicated in the appropriateness of admission. Methods: Were included and registered demographic parameters, hospital admi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Revista Médica Universitaria
Autores principales: Lascano, Soledad, Morea, Gastón, Salomón, Susana
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/fichas.php?idobjeto=11572
todos_str_mv 11542
1221
HospLagClinMed
HospLagClinMed
spa
Trabajo original
UNCuyo FCM
UNCuyo FCM
descriptores_str_mv Admisión del paciente
Atención hospitalaria
Calidad de la Atención de Salud
Factores socioeconómicos
Hospital Luis Lagomaggiore (Mendoza, Argentina)
Hospitalización
Hospitalizacion inadecuada
disciplina_str_mv Ciencias médicas
titulo_str_mv Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
autor_str_mv Lascano, Soledad
Morea, Gastón
Salomón, Susana
description_str_mv Objective: To characterize hospital admissions in the Internal Medicine department of a general hospital. To analyze social, economic and environmental health factors implicated in the appropriateness of admission. Methods: Were included and registered demographic parameters, hospital admission characteristics (workday vs weekend/holyday, routine vs emergency, reasons of admission), educational level, labor and habitational conditions, comorbidities, autonomy (basic and instrumental activities of daily living) and performance status. A cross-sectional and descriptive study design was employed. An Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was used as a screening tool to evaluate inadequate admissions. Data collected was analyzed by Epi Info 7 software at descriptive and analytical levels. Results: 124 admissions were included, 53% male, average age 52.5 years old (±15.2), 43% single and 38% married. 12% with health insurance. 88.5% lived in Gran Mendoza. 86% of the admissions were registered during a workday, 94% for a clinical reasons (19% dyspnea, 16% disorders of consciousness and 10% fever). 5% of admitted patients were asymptomatic. 50% of patients were admitted by the emergency department, 33% from outpatient clinics and 18% from other departments. Illiterate 5%, complete elementary school 22%, complete high school 14% and university 2%. 25% were employed, only 15% had employment stability. Retired 6%. 28% received subsidy (10% for disability). 14% received social support. 13% live alone. 21% were family support, 20% referred child care responsibility, and 5% disabled child care. 2% were homeless. Without drinking water supply 8%, and 17.5% without connection to the sewage network. Average Charlson score 4 points (± 2.1), APACHE II score 11.5 points (± 6.1), BADL 4.1 (± 2.1) and IADL 3.9 (± 2.5). 33% of the hospital admissions were inadequate according to the level of care facilities offered at our institution. 71% could have been carried out in a less complex institution. The main reasons of inappropriate admissions were conservative clinical observation in 36.5%, persistence of clinical syndrome and waiting time to consolidate treatment in 17%; followed by homeless situation, waiting time for surgical procedure, waiting time for orthopedic supplies, risk for continuity of outpatient care, waiting time for complementary diagnostic procedure and limitation of the therapeutic efforts. The comparative analysis between appropriate vs inappropriate admissions proved that having a low APACHE II score (p <0.01), living outside the metropolitan region of Gran Mendoza (p <0.05), and having a low educational level (p <0.01) were significantly more frequent in patients with inadequate admissions. Conclusion Inappropriate admissions rate was estimated to be 33% in our study. Having a low APACHE II score, living outside the metropolitan region of Gran Mendoza and having a low educational level, were significantly more frequent in patients with inadequate admissions. The pursuit for efficiency in hospital management should motivate the use of measurement and screening tools to detect these inappropriate admissions.
Objetivos: Caracterizar la adecuación de la hospitalización de la población internada en un servicio de clínica médica de un hospital general de agudos. Analizar determinantes de la salud socio-económicoambientales implicados en la misma. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio protocolizado, descriptivo y transversal. Incluyó parámetros demográficos, características del ingreso hospitalario (fecha, origen y motivo de ingreso), escolaridad, situación laboral, condiciones habitacionales y convivientes, subsidios, Charlson, APACHE II, y Actividades básicas (ABVD) e instrumentales de la vida diaria (AIVD). Se evaluó la adecuación de la hospitalización mediante el Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) modificado. Análisis estadístico: medidas de tendencia central, dispersión, ANOVA y chi2. Significancia p <0.05. Resultados: Se analizaron 124 estadías, 53% género masculino, edad media (x) 52.5 años (±15.2), 43% solteros y 38% casados. Con cobertura social 12%. Vivían en Gran Mendoza 88.5%. El 86% de las admisiones se realizaron durante un día laboral, 94% por motivos clínicos (disnea 19%, trastorno de conciencia 16% y fiebre 10%). Ingresó 5% de pacientes asintomáticos. 50% de pacientes ingresados provenían de guardia, 33% de consultorios externos y 18% pases de otros servicios. Analfabetos 5%, primario completo 22%, secundario completo 14% y universitarios 2%. Tenía trabajo 25%, solo 15% presentaba estabilidad laboral. Jubilados 6%. Referían alguna pensión 28% (10% por discapacidad). Recibían un plan social 14%. Vivían solos 13%. Eran sostén de familia 21%, presentando menores a cargo 20%, x de 1.7 menores (±1.1), y discapacitados a cargo 5%. En situación de calle 2%. Sin conexión a red de agua potable 8%, y 17.5% sin conexión a red cloacal. Charlson x 4 puntos (±2.1), APACHE II x 11.5 puntos (±6.1), ABVD x 4.1 (±2.1) y AIVD x 3.9 (±2.5). El 33% de las estadías hospitalarias fueron inadecuadas (grupo AdIn) al nivel asistencial ofrecido en nuestra institución. Podrían haberse llevado a cabo en institución de menor complejidad 71%. La observación clínica en 36.5%, falta de consolidación en el tratamiento y persistencia del cuadro clínico en 17%, fueron las causas más frecuentes, seguidas por situación de calle, espera de procedimiento quirúrgico y material ortopédico, falta de medicación ambulatoria, espera de realización de examen complementario y adecuación de esfuerzos terapéuticos. Del análisis comparativo de AdIn vs No AdIn, presentar APACHE II más bajo (p <0.01), vivir fuera de la región metropolitana de Gran Mendoza (p <0.05), y tener bajo nivel de instrucción (p <0.01) fue significativamente más frecuente en pacientes AdIn. Conclusiones La tasa de estadías hospitalarias inadecuadas en nuestro medio fue 33%. Presentar APACHE II más bajo, vivir fuera de la región metropolitana de Gran Mendoza y tener bajo nivel de instrucción, fue significativamente más frecuentes en pacientes AdIn. La búsqueda de eficiencia en gestión hospitalaria debe motivar el empleo de indicadores de gestión que permitan detectar estadías inadecuadas.
object_type_str_mv Textual: Revistas
id 11572
plantilla_str Artículo de Revista
record_format article
container_title Revista Médica Universitaria
journal_title_str Revista Médica Universitaria
journal_id_str r-1221
container_issue Revista Médica Universitaria
container_volume Vol. 14, no. 2
journal_issue_str Vol. 14, no. 2
tipo_str textuales
type_str_mv Articulos
title_full Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
title_fullStr Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
title_full_unstemmed Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
description Objective: To characterize hospital admissions in the Internal Medicine department of a general hospital. To analyze social, economic and environmental health factors implicated in the appropriateness of admission. Methods: Were included and registered demographic parameters, hospital admission characteristics (workday vs weekend/holyday, routine vs emergency, reasons of admission), educational level, labor and habitational conditions, comorbidities, autonomy (basic and instrumental activities of daily living) and performance status. A cross-sectional and descriptive study design was employed. An Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) was used as a screening tool to evaluate inadequate admissions. Data collected was analyzed by Epi Info 7 software at descriptive and analytical levels. Results: 124 admissions were included, 53% male, average age 52.5 years old (±15.2), 43% single and 38% married. 12% with health insurance. 88.5% lived in Gran Mendoza. 86% of the admissions were registered during a workday, 94% for a clinical reasons (19% dyspnea, 16% disorders of consciousness and 10% fever). 5% of admitted patients were asymptomatic. 50% of patients were admitted by the emergency department, 33% from outpatient clinics and 18% from other departments. Illiterate 5%, complete elementary school 22%, complete high school 14% and university 2%. 25% were employed, only 15% had employment stability. Retired 6%. 28% received subsidy (10% for disability). 14% received social support. 13% live alone. 21% were family support, 20% referred child care responsibility, and 5% disabled child care. 2% were homeless. Without drinking water supply 8%, and 17.5% without connection to the sewage network. Average Charlson score 4 points (± 2.1), APACHE II score 11.5 points (± 6.1), BADL 4.1 (± 2.1) and IADL 3.9 (± 2.5). 33% of the hospital admissions were inadequate according to the level of care facilities offered at our institution. 71% could have been carried out in a less complex institution. The main reasons of inappropriate admissions were conservative clinical observation in 36.5%, persistence of clinical syndrome and waiting time to consolidate treatment in 17%; followed by homeless situation, waiting time for surgical procedure, waiting time for orthopedic supplies, risk for continuity of outpatient care, waiting time for complementary diagnostic procedure and limitation of the therapeutic efforts. The comparative analysis between appropriate vs inappropriate admissions proved that having a low APACHE II score (p <0.01), living outside the metropolitan region of Gran Mendoza (p <0.05), and having a low educational level (p <0.01) were significantly more frequent in patients with inadequate admissions. Conclusion Inappropriate admissions rate was estimated to be 33% in our study. Having a low APACHE II score, living outside the metropolitan region of Gran Mendoza and having a low educational level, were significantly more frequent in patients with inadequate admissions. The pursuit for efficiency in hospital management should motivate the use of measurement and screening tools to detect these inappropriate admissions.
dependencia_str_mv Facultad de Ciencias Médicas
title Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
spellingShingle Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
Admisión del paciente
Atención hospitalaria
Calidad de la Atención de Salud
Factores socioeconómicos
Hospital Luis Lagomaggiore (Mendoza, Argentina)
Hospitalización
Hospitalizacion inadecuada
Lascano, Soledad
Morea, Gastón
Salomón, Susana
topic Admisión del paciente
Atención hospitalaria
Calidad de la Atención de Salud
Factores socioeconómicos
Hospital Luis Lagomaggiore (Mendoza, Argentina)
Hospitalización
Hospitalizacion inadecuada
topic_facet Admisión del paciente
Atención hospitalaria
Calidad de la Atención de Salud
Factores socioeconómicos
Hospital Luis Lagomaggiore (Mendoza, Argentina)
Hospitalización
Hospitalizacion inadecuada
author Lascano, Soledad
Morea, Gastón
Salomón, Susana
author_facet Lascano, Soledad
Morea, Gastón
Salomón, Susana
title_sort Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
title_short Evaluación de estadísticas hospitalarias
url https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/fichas.php?idobjeto=11572
estado_str 3
building Biblioteca Digital
filtrotop_str Biblioteca Digital
collection Artículo de Revista
institution Sistema Integrado de Documentación
indexed_str 2023-04-25 00:36
_version_ 1764120184065359872