Human progress and development /

If development as human progress takes itself seriously, it has to reveal the deceitful publicity of development as capitalist freedom. Development as capitalist freedom is currently discussed under the heading globalisation. The pros and cons of the globalisation debate are well established; has th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bonefeld, Werner (autor.)
Formato: Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: Quilmes, Argentina : Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, 2003.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://elibro.net/ereader/siduncu/20961
LEADER 02835nab a2200397 i 4500
001 ELB20961
003 FINmELB
005 20230802144314.0
006 m o d |
007 cr cnu||||||||
008 230704c20039999ag fr p o 0 0eng d
022 |a 1515-6443 
035 |a (OCoLC)1394962682 
040 |a FINmELB  |b spa  |e rda  |c FINmELB 
050 4 |a H61  |b .B664 2003 
080 |a 3 
082 0 4 |a 300  |2 23 
100 1 |a Bonefeld, Werner,  |e autor. 
245 1 0 |a Human progress and development /  |c Werner Bonefeld. 
264 1 |a Quilmes, Argentina :  |b Universidad Nacional de Quilmes,  |c 2003. 
310 |a Semestral 
336 |a texto  |b txt  |2 rdacontent/spa 
337 |a computadora  |b c  |2 rdamedia/spa 
338 |a recurso en línea  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier/spa 
362 0 |a 2000- 
520 |a If development as human progress takes itself seriously, it has to reveal the deceitful publicity of development as capitalist freedom. Development as capitalist freedom is currently discussed under the heading globalisation. The pros and cons of the globalisation debate are well established; has the economy escaped the national state irretrievably or does the national state retain regulative power over the economy. The question, then, is that of relative autonomy; has globalisation established the autonomy of the economy over the state or does the state at least potentially retain autonomy over the economy, should the balance of class forces change in favour of labour. This article approaches globalisation from quite different perspectives. It explores the human content of globalisation and analyses the political constitution of economic categories. The conclusion discusses the issue of human progress as human self-emancipation and offers some practical suggestions, both on the danger of nationalist conceptions of anti-globalisation and on anti-globalisation as a project of human freedom. The argument urges that in the struggle for the equality of individual human needs, it is precisely necessary to avoid ever again to counterpose "society" as an abstraction to the individual (Marx). 
588 |a Descripción basada en metadatos suministrados por el editor y otras fuentes. 
588 |a Descripción basada en Revista theomai, n. 8 (segundo semestre 2003), P. 18 sin numerar. 
590 |a Recurso electrónico. Santa Fe, Arg.: elibro, 2023. Disponible vía World Wide Web. El acceso puede estar limitado para las bibliotecas afiliadas a elibro. 
650 4 |a Desarrollo. 
650 4 |a Globalización. 
650 4 |a Progreso humano. 
655 4 |a Artículos electrónicos. 
773 1 |t Revista theomai.  |x ISSN1515-6443  |d Bernal, Argentina : Universidad Nacional de Quilmes.  |g n. 8 (segundo semestre 2003), p. 18 sin numerar 
797 2 |a elibro, Corp. 
856 4 0 |u https://elibro.net/ereader/siduncu/20961