Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata
Chloris elata is an important weed for grain and sugarcane crops. In addition to its aggressiveness, it may show resistance to glyphosate herbicide. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of glyphosate formulations, isolated or in association with ACCase inhibitors,...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Lenguaje: | eng |
| Publicado: |
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNCuyo
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/4790 |
| id |
I11-R107article-4790 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
ojs |
| institution |
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo |
| building |
Revistas en línea |
| filtrotop_str |
Revistas en línea |
| collection |
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias |
| journal_title_str |
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias |
| institution_str |
I-11 |
| repository_str |
R-107 |
| language |
eng |
| format |
Online |
| author |
Paiola Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Moreira Silva, André Felipe Arrobas Martins Barroso, Arthur Paiola Albrecht, Leandro Placido, Henrique Fabrício de Marco, Lucas Rafael Baccin, Luisa Carolina Victoria-Filho, Ricardo |
| spellingShingle |
Paiola Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Moreira Silva, André Felipe Arrobas Martins Barroso, Arthur Paiola Albrecht, Leandro Placido, Henrique Fabrício de Marco, Lucas Rafael Baccin, Luisa Carolina Victoria-Filho, Ricardo Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata control químico cletodim haloxifop quizalofop setoxidim mezcla de tanque chemical control clethodim haloxyfop quizalofop sethoxydim tank mix |
| author_facet |
Paiola Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Moreira Silva, André Felipe Arrobas Martins Barroso, Arthur Paiola Albrecht, Leandro Placido, Henrique Fabrício de Marco, Lucas Rafael Baccin, Luisa Carolina Victoria-Filho, Ricardo |
| author_sort |
Paiola Albrecht, Alfredo Junior |
| title |
Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata |
| title_short |
Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata |
| title_full |
Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata |
| title_fullStr |
Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata |
| title_sort |
mixtures between glyphosate formulations and accase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of chloris elata |
| description |
Chloris elata is an important weed for grain and sugarcane crops. In addition to its aggressiveness, it may show resistance to glyphosate herbicide. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of glyphosate formulations, isolated or in association with ACCase inhibitors, in controlling C. elata (putatively resistant to glyphosate) at different developmental stages. Four experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design. Treatments consisted of glyphosate application under different formulations with ACCase inhibitors, isolated or in mixtures. Applications were carried out at the stages of four fully expanded leaves in Experiment I, four tillers in Experiment II, and at regrowth of the four-tiller plants in Experiments III and IV. Applications of glyphosate isopropylamine salt associated with sethoxydim or clethodim showed to be among the best treatments in Experiments I, II, and III, presenting control scores equal to or greater than 90%. However, not even these treatments could provide successful control in Experiment IV. Moreover, and regardless of the formulation, isolated glyphosate, showed 85% (Experiment III) and 50% (Experiment IV) maximum controls. Associations between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides showed to be effective in controlling C. elata, especially at early developmental stages. In general, isolated herbicides provided lower percentages of control, as well as higher values of dry matter. Sole herbicide applications were not effective in controlling C. elata (putatively resistant to glyphosate), regardless of the developmental stage.
Highlights:
Mixtures between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting have been shown to be effective in C. elata control, especially in the early development stages.
Isolated herbicide applications were not effective in controlling C. elata, regardless of the development stage.
Mixtures between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting is more important in the control than the glyphosate formulation or ACCase-inhibiting used.
|
| publisher |
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNCuyo |
| publishDate |
2021 |
| url |
https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/4790 |
| topic |
control químico cletodim haloxifop quizalofop setoxidim mezcla de tanque chemical control clethodim haloxyfop quizalofop sethoxydim tank mix |
| topic_facet |
control químico cletodim haloxifop quizalofop setoxidim mezcla de tanque chemical control clethodim haloxyfop quizalofop sethoxydim tank mix |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT paiolaalbrechtalfredojunior mixturesbetweenglyphosateformulationsandaccaseinhibitingherbicidesinthecontrolofchloriselata AT moreirasilvaandrefelipe mixturesbetweenglyphosateformulationsandaccaseinhibitingherbicidesinthecontrolofchloriselata AT arrobasmartinsbarrosoarthur mixturesbetweenglyphosateformulationsandaccaseinhibitingherbicidesinthecontrolofchloriselata AT paiolaalbrechtleandro mixturesbetweenglyphosateformulationsandaccaseinhibitingherbicidesinthecontrolofchloriselata AT placidohenriquefabricio mixturesbetweenglyphosateformulationsandaccaseinhibitingherbicidesinthecontrolofchloriselata AT demarcolucasrafael mixturesbetweenglyphosateformulationsandaccaseinhibitingherbicidesinthecontrolofchloriselata AT baccinluisacarolina mixturesbetweenglyphosateformulationsandaccaseinhibitingherbicidesinthecontrolofchloriselata AT victoriafilhoricardo mixturesbetweenglyphosateformulationsandaccaseinhibitingherbicidesinthecontrolofchloriselata |
| _version_ |
1800220931289776128 |
| spelling |
I11-R107article-47902021-07-07T00:36:25Z Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata Mixtures between glyphosate formulations and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in the control of Chloris elata Paiola Albrecht, Alfredo Junior Moreira Silva, André Felipe Arrobas Martins Barroso, Arthur Paiola Albrecht, Leandro Placido, Henrique Fabrício de Marco, Lucas Rafael Baccin, Luisa Carolina Victoria-Filho, Ricardo control químico cletodim haloxifop quizalofop setoxidim mezcla de tanque chemical control clethodim haloxyfop quizalofop sethoxydim tank mix Chloris elata is an important weed for grain and sugarcane crops. In addition to its aggressiveness, it may show resistance to glyphosate herbicide. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of glyphosate formulations, isolated or in association with ACCase inhibitors, in controlling C. elata (putatively resistant to glyphosate) at different developmental stages. Four experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design. Treatments consisted of glyphosate application under different formulations with ACCase inhibitors, isolated or in mixtures. Applications were carried out at the stages of four fully expanded leaves in Experiment I, four tillers in Experiment II, and at regrowth of the four-tiller plants in Experiments III and IV. Applications of glyphosate isopropylamine salt associated with sethoxydim or clethodim showed to be among the best treatments in Experiments I, II, and III, presenting control scores equal to or greater than 90%. However, not even these treatments could provide successful control in Experiment IV. Moreover, and regardless of the formulation, isolated glyphosate, showed 85% (Experiment III) and 50% (Experiment IV) maximum controls. Associations between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides showed to be effective in controlling C. elata, especially at early developmental stages. In general, isolated herbicides provided lower percentages of control, as well as higher values of dry matter. Sole herbicide applications were not effective in controlling C. elata (putatively resistant to glyphosate), regardless of the developmental stage. Highlights: Mixtures between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting have been shown to be effective in C. elata control, especially in the early development stages. Isolated herbicide applications were not effective in controlling C. elata, regardless of the development stage. Mixtures between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting is more important in the control than the glyphosate formulation or ACCase-inhibiting used. Chloris elata is an important weed for grain and sugarcane crops. In addition to its aggressiveness, it may show resistance to glyphosate herbicide. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of glyphosate formulations, isolated or in association with ACCase inhibitors, in controlling C. elata (putatively resistant to glyphosate) at different developmental stages. Four experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design. Treatments consisted of glyphosate application under different formulations with ACCase inhibitors, isolated or in mixtures. Applications were carried out at the stages of four fully expanded leaves in Experiment I, four tillers in Experiment II, and at regrowth of the four-tiller plants in Experiments III and IV. Applications of glyphosate isopropylamine salt associated with sethoxydim or clethodim showed to be among the best treatments in Experiments I, II, and III, presenting control scores equal to or greater than 90%. However, not even these treatments could provide successful control in Experiment IV. Moreover, and regardless of the formulation, isolated glyphosate, showed 85% (Experiment III) and 50% (Experiment IV) maximum controls. Associations between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides showed to be effective in controlling C. elata, especially at early developmental stages. In general, isolated herbicides provided lower percentages of control, as well as higher values of dry matter. Sole herbicide applications were not effective in controlling C. elata (putatively resistant to glyphosate), regardless of the developmental stage. Highlights: Mixtures between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting have been shown to be effective in C. elata control, especially in the early development stages. Isolated herbicide applications were not effective in controlling C. elata, regardless of the development stage. Mixtures between glyphosate and ACCase-inhibiting is more important in the control than the glyphosate formulation or ACCase-inhibiting used. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNCuyo 2021-07-07 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/4790 10.48162/rev.39.026 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo; Vol. 53 No. 1 (2021): January-June; 274-282 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo; Vol. 53 Núm. 1 (2021): Enero-Junio; 274-282 1853-8665 0370-4661 eng https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/4790/3484 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es |
