Comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of Montevideo city, Uruguay
Risk assessment of urban trees is an incipient practice in Latin America, generally performed with foreign methods, due to the lack of qualified personnel and locally validated or adapted methodology. This article evaluates the application of three methods on street trees in Montevideo city, Urugua...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online |
Lenguaje: | eng |
Publicado: |
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNCuyo
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/5124 |
id |
I11-R107article-5124 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
institution |
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo |
building |
Revistas en línea |
filtrotop_str |
Revistas en línea |
collection |
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias |
journal_title_str |
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias |
institution_str |
I-11 |
repository_str |
R-107 |
language |
eng |
format |
Online |
author |
Ameneiros, Cecilia Fratti, Paulina Sergio, Agustina Coelho-Duarte, Ana Paula Ponce-Donoso, Mauricio Vallejos-Barra, Óscar |
spellingShingle |
Ameneiros, Cecilia Fratti, Paulina Sergio, Agustina Coelho-Duarte, Ana Paula Ponce-Donoso, Mauricio Vallejos-Barra, Óscar Comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of Montevideo city, Uruguay arboriculture hazard tree risk component tree risk urban forest arboricultura árbol peligroso componentes del riesgo riesgo del árbol bosque urbano |
author_facet |
Ameneiros, Cecilia Fratti, Paulina Sergio, Agustina Coelho-Duarte, Ana Paula Ponce-Donoso, Mauricio Vallejos-Barra, Óscar |
author_sort |
Ameneiros, Cecilia |
title |
Comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of Montevideo city, Uruguay |
title_short |
Comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of Montevideo city, Uruguay |
title_full |
Comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of Montevideo city, Uruguay |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of Montevideo city, Uruguay |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of Montevideo city, Uruguay |
title_sort |
comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of montevideo city, uruguay |
description |
Risk assessment of urban trees is an incipient practice in Latin America, generally performed with foreign methods, due to the lack of qualified personnel and locally validated or adapted methodology. This article evaluates the application of three methods on street trees in Montevideo city, Uruguay: Tree Hazard Risk Evaluation and Treatment System (THREATS), Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) and Best Management Practices - Tree Risk Assessment (ISA BMP). Three assessors with similar experience applied three methods in 36 trees of three widely used genera, totaling 324 assessments and 1,296 data. The methods were decomposed into the components: Likelihood of Failure, Likelihood of Impact, Consequence and Risk Rating. The data were statistically analyzed through a generalized linear mixed model (p<0.05), for the factors: assessor, method, genus, and their interactions. Results showed no significant differences among assessors, but there were differences among methods, specifically for the Likelihood of Impact and Risk Rating components. The ISA BMP method presented higher means in these last two components. Still, this method is suggested for street trees in Montevideo until a more appropriate method is adapted or developed for local conditions.
Highlights
No significant differences were found among assessors, which encourages standard training for all assessors.
The ISA BMP method presented the highest results for the likelihood of impact and risk rating.
Target occupation rate influenced differences among genera found for the likelihood of impact component.
The ISA BMP method is suggested for street trees risk assessment in Montevideo, until a method is adapted or developed.
The absence of descriptors and categorizations, as well as the application time, need to be improved.
|
publisher |
Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNCuyo |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/5124 |
topic |
arboriculture hazard tree risk component tree risk urban forest arboricultura árbol peligroso componentes del riesgo riesgo del árbol bosque urbano |
topic_facet |
arboriculture hazard tree risk component tree risk urban forest arboricultura árbol peligroso componentes del riesgo riesgo del árbol bosque urbano |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ameneiroscecilia comparisonofvisualriskassessmentmethodsappliedinstreettreesofmontevideocityuruguay AT frattipaulina comparisonofvisualriskassessmentmethodsappliedinstreettreesofmontevideocityuruguay AT sergioagustina comparisonofvisualriskassessmentmethodsappliedinstreettreesofmontevideocityuruguay AT coelhoduarteanapaula comparisonofvisualriskassessmentmethodsappliedinstreettreesofmontevideocityuruguay AT poncedonosomauricio comparisonofvisualriskassessmentmethodsappliedinstreettreesofmontevideocityuruguay AT vallejosbarraoscar comparisonofvisualriskassessmentmethodsappliedinstreettreesofmontevideocityuruguay |
_version_ |
1800220932731568128 |
spelling |
I11-R107article-51242022-12-19T18:29:03Z Comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of Montevideo city, Uruguay Comparison of visual risk assessment methods applied in street trees of Montevideo city, Uruguay Ameneiros, Cecilia Fratti, Paulina Sergio, Agustina Coelho-Duarte, Ana Paula Ponce-Donoso, Mauricio Vallejos-Barra, Óscar arboriculture hazard tree risk component tree risk urban forest arboricultura árbol peligroso componentes del riesgo riesgo del árbol bosque urbano Risk assessment of urban trees is an incipient practice in Latin America, generally performed with foreign methods, due to the lack of qualified personnel and locally validated or adapted methodology. This article evaluates the application of three methods on street trees in Montevideo city, Uruguay: Tree Hazard Risk Evaluation and Treatment System (THREATS), Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) and Best Management Practices - Tree Risk Assessment (ISA BMP). Three assessors with similar experience applied three methods in 36 trees of three widely used genera, totaling 324 assessments and 1,296 data. The methods were decomposed into the components: Likelihood of Failure, Likelihood of Impact, Consequence and Risk Rating. The data were statistically analyzed through a generalized linear mixed model (p<0.05), for the factors: assessor, method, genus, and their interactions. Results showed no significant differences among assessors, but there were differences among methods, specifically for the Likelihood of Impact and Risk Rating components. The ISA BMP method presented higher means in these last two components. Still, this method is suggested for street trees in Montevideo until a more appropriate method is adapted or developed for local conditions. Highlights No significant differences were found among assessors, which encourages standard training for all assessors. The ISA BMP method presented the highest results for the likelihood of impact and risk rating. Target occupation rate influenced differences among genera found for the likelihood of impact component. The ISA BMP method is suggested for street trees risk assessment in Montevideo, until a method is adapted or developed. The absence of descriptors and categorizations, as well as the application time, need to be improved. Risk assessment of urban trees is an incipient practice in Latin America, generally performed with foreign methods, due to the lack of qualified personnel and locally validated or adapted methodology. This article evaluates the application of three methods on street trees in Montevideo city, Uruguay: Tree Hazard Risk Evaluation and Treatment System (THREATS), Quantified Tree Risk Assessment (QTRA) and Best Management Practices - Tree Risk Assessment (ISA BMP). Three assessors with similar experience applied three methods in 36 trees of three widely used genera, totaling 324 assessments and 1,296 data. The methods were decomposed into the components: Likelihood of Failure, Likelihood of Impact, Consequence and Risk Rating. The data were statistically analyzed through a generalized linear mixed model (p<0.05), for the factors: assessor, method, genus, and their interactions. Results showed no significant differences among assessors, but there were differences among methods, specifically for the Likelihood of Impact and Risk Rating components. The ISA BMP method presented higher means in these last two components. Still, this method is suggested for street trees in Montevideo until a more appropriate method is adapted or developed for local conditions. Highlights No significant differences were found among assessors, which encourages standard training for all assessors. The ISA BMP method presented the highest results for the likelihood of impact and risk rating. Target occupation rate influenced differences among genera found for the likelihood of impact component. The ISA BMP method is suggested for street trees risk assessment in Montevideo, until a method is adapted or developed. The absence of descriptors and categorizations, as well as the application time, need to be improved. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias-UNCuyo 2022-12-19 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/5124 10.48162/rev.39.081 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo; Vol. 54 No. 2 (2022): July-December; 38-47 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo; Vol. 54 Núm. 2 (2022): Julio-Diciembre; 38-47 1853-8665 0370-4661 eng https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/RFCA/article/view/5124/5012 Derechos de autor 2018 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/deed.es |