Efectos del cambio de sistema bipolar rígido a uno flexible en la política exterior de Estados Unidos a Centroamérica
Central America is located within the sphere of natural influence of the United States, and, therefore, has always had to deal with the processes that seek its hegemony. Thus, the period of the Cold War was no exception, but with the change of international system from a rigid bipolar to a flexible...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Maestría en Estudios Latinoamericanos, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/mel/article/view/2473 |
| Sumario: | Central America is located within the sphere of natural influence of the United States, and, therefore, has always had to deal with the processes that seek its hegemony. Thus, the period of the Cold War was no exception, but with the change of international system from a rigid bipolar to a flexible one, it is valid to ask whether this change affected US foreign policy. To answer it, the theoretical precepts are used as the periodization of the cold war proposed by Fred Halliday, systems theory by Morton Kaplan, systemic structural realism or neorealism by Kenneth Waltz, and the Theory of hegemony and agency by Joseph Tulchin. |
|---|
