Cuando pase el Temblor. Apuntes para pensar la relación entre el Estado y los movimientos sociales
The demonstrations of December 19 and 20, 2001 broke into the plot of political, economic and social relations and evidenced the beginning –or the redefinition– of new forms of collective action. In this context, the various social movements established a relationship with the State that was not exe...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Maestría en Estudios Latinoamericanos, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://revistas.uncu.edu.ar/ojs3/index.php/mel/article/view/5589 |
| Sumario: | The demonstrations of December 19 and 20, 2001 broke into the plot of political, economic and social relations and evidenced the beginning –or the redefinition– of new forms of collective action. In this context, the various social movements established a relationship with the State that was not exempt from tensions and contradictions.A first approximation to this question requires the distinction of two stages: the first of them, runs from December 2001 to the inauguration of Néstor Kirchner in 2003 and is marked by a state of social agitation evidenced in heterogeneous collective actions: piquetes y asambleas. (Schuster, et al. 2006); the second stage includes the first government of Kirchner (2003-2007) who maintained a close relationship (but no less conflictive) with the various social movements.In short, the question that guides our work refers to How to analyze the complex and tense relationship between the State and the Social Movements after the 2001 crisis? Through this question, we will propose a series of conceptualizations that allow us to making it more complex and problematize this relationship in the light of new ways of thinking about social actors, the political system, politics and conflict. |
|---|
